We recently encountered a situation that was a textbook
example of how strict adherence to SEO guidelines can potentially do more harm
than good for a law firm.
The case involved a small multi-practice firm seeking to
drive up web traffic for its personal injury business. The firm’s web provider had done a good
job in optimizing the site for PI, splashing all of the keywords and images
across any and all of the site’s pages. The firm’s experience in handling PI
was highlighted throughout and attorney bios emphasized personal backgrounds in
this area of the law. Not surprisingly, traffic to the site increased
several-fold. All of this would, under normal circumstances be considered a
good thing.
Except that in this case, it was not.
The bulk of the firm’s revenue
stemmed from practice areas geared more towards business and government than
towards the general public. Its target audience, which often included business
decision makers and governmental officials, was far less prone to visiting web
sites based on online directory searches than it was to visiting web sites as a
means for learning more about the firm as based upon professional referrals.
Visitors to the site wanted to ascertain the depth of understanding the firm
had in regards to business and governmental matters, the experience its
attorneys had in these areas and the range of services the firm might provide.
Yet, when such visitors came to the site, they were besieged
by headlines, photos and verbiage that screamed “Personal Injury” – in some
cases, even on pages that had nothing to do with that topic. Instead of coming
away with the perception that this was a firm with many practice areas, one of
which was PI, the net takeaway was that this was, in fact, a personal injury
law practice that, yes, “dabbled” in a few other areas as well. In short, the
firm lost its opportunity to convey its legal acumen in areas where it was
critical that they do. When one considers that personal injury did not represent even the largest of the
firm’s revenue segments, it’s not hard to see how detrimental the SEO
initiative was to the overall health of the firm.
This is why it is so very, very important to take a holistic
approach to the task of business generation. Things are not always as they seem. In this case, there was
a discussion to be had that probably never took place. That discussion would
have elicited 3 possible approaches to address this dilemma. First, the firm
might have taken a balanced approach and done the best that it could in
highlighting all practice areas including PI. Second, it might have determined
that personal injury represented the greatest potential revenue stream, all
other practice groups be damned. Or third, it might have understood that
optimizing for PI might cannibalize its other revenue sources and decided to
have two sites, one focusing on the firm at large and the other, dedicated to
personal injury and optimized to the hilt.
In deciding on a marketing approach – whatever type of
business development tools are being used, it is important to understand how
such tools fit into the big picture. Failing to do so only risks having that
big picture become not so big.